The Record Collectors Guild Forum Index

Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
worldmusicOffline
Post subject: How perfect does NM have to be?  PostPosted: Dec 16, 2009 - 10:46 AM
Level 5
Level 5


Joined: Apr 22, 2009
Posts: 122

Status: Offline
Evidently I'm a strict grader due to buyers feedback, but I'm a little confused about a pink floyd album the wall, which I bought from the store, and am labeling it nm. I know it plays flawlessly, but due to the way it was made, there are what I would call cirrus clouds, little visible blemishes under strong light. If I was the buyer, I wouldn't care as long as it sounded good. Is a record NM if these blemishes are from how the lp was made, rather than what the owner did?
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
PaceyOffline
Post subject: RE: How perfect does NM have to be?  PostPosted: Dec 16, 2009 - 12:03 PM
R.C.Guild-SMR
R.C.Guild-SMR


Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Posts: 3025
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
For Internet auctions I grade visually as well as aurally - if it *sounds* NM then say so. But also grade it visually, you have what is probably light bagrash which although it doesn't affect the audio, it can put off the 'mint only' buyers. I recently sold a beautiful LOOKING Sgt Pepper for more than a VG one that sounded cleaner (stated as such in the auctions.) Some people buy for visuals so it's best to cater for both particularly when you're selling discs by collectable artists like PF.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
ChadFromCanadaOffline
Post subject: RE: How perfect does NM have to be?  PostPosted: Dec 16, 2009 - 12:26 PM
R.C.Guild-SM
R.C.Guild-SM


Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 3186
Location: Regina, SK
Status: Offline
Note the visible scuffs but state that it doesn't affect play if in fact it is like that. I agree that I wouldn't care if it had blemishes but sounded fine.

_________________
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
rnbOffline
Post subject: RE: How perfect does NM have to be?  PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 07:05 AM
Level 1
Level 1


Joined: Jan 24, 2010
Posts: 4

Status: Offline
Perhaps it is just me but I would not grade a record that has chemical stains or other obvious visual flaws as NM.

You might consider both visual and aural grading.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ShadySamOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 07:58 AM
R.C.Guild-SMR
R.C.Guild-SMR


Joined: May 23, 2005
Posts: 16087

Status: Offline
those 'clouds' you mention don't bother me as much as those little raised 'pimples' I sometimes
encounter (on an otherwise NM disc)... those 'lil suckers can play havoc on your stylus... Mad
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
hrtshpdbox
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 10:40 AM
R.C.Guild-SM
R.C.Guild-SM


Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Posts: 5931
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Clouds, scuffs, pimples, anything - just drop it to VG + + and feel comfortable that there's no way you'll be accused of "over-grading". If you put up a sound clip with the auction then potential buyers have a lot more information to work with, and you've provided more disclosure.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
CactusCowboyOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 11:19 AM
R.C.Guild-M-SMR
R.C.Guild-M-SMR


Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 11683
Location: Powell, Wyoming
Status: Offline
IMO "Near Mint" is exactly what it means, NEAR mint. With experience in manufacturing, I know that producing something that's perfect (Mint) is virtually impossible. That's why tolerances are specified for manufactured parts and products and standards (with a range of acceptable variances) are in place for quality control purposes.

Most of us have bought enough new records to know that superficial scuffs and very minor warps are not uncommon. As long as such minor flaws on a used record do not audibly affect playback, I see no reason to not grade "NM."

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/cactuscowboy
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
hrtshpdbox
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 12:23 PM
R.C.Guild-SM
R.C.Guild-SM


Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Posts: 5931
Location: Harrisburg, PA
CactusCowboy wrote:

Most of us have bought enough new records to know that superficial scuffs and very minor warps are not uncommon. As long as such minor flaws on a used record do not audibly affect playback, I see no reason to not grade "NM."


Can't agree, I think a seller should call a perfect record Near Mint, and call anything less than perfect something different. New records with superficial scuffs and very minor warps are VG+ or VG + +. "Minor flaws on a used record" does not sound like NM to me. Part of the grade for a record is visual, obviously, and a record with visual flaws can never be called NM regardless of how perfectly it might play; I've gotten too many records in the mail that seller's called NM that barely warrant a VG+, in my opinion.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
whirlingdiscOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 01:15 PM
R.C.Guild-M-SMR
R.C.Guild-M-SMR


Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Posts: 5829

Status: Offline
hrtshpdbox wrote:


Can't agree, I think a seller should call a perfect record Near Mint, and call anything less than perfect something different. New records with superficial scuffs and very minor warps are VG+ or VG + +. "Minor flaws on a used record" does not sound like NM to me. Part of the grade for a record is visual, obviously, and a record with visual flaws can never be called NM regardless of how perfectly it might play; I've gotten too many records in the mail that seller's called NM that barely warrant a VG+, in my opinion.


Can't agree with this! A "perfect" record should be classified as Mint! If you're going to classify a "perfect" record as Near Mint, then what good is the "Near" part? Perfect in itself precludes the word "Near". The "N" in NM allows for miniscule flaws. I certainly agree that a record with a rim warp would never achieve that grade, but a record with a couple of light storage scuffs could easily qualify.
And I guess that's why there is so much disparity in the vinyl grading business. The best thing, in my opinion, is to accurately describe ANY flaws (visual or aural) and the buyer can make up his own mind.

_________________
Do what you dig---dig what you do!!!
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
hrtshpdbox
Post subject:   PostPosted: Jan 24, 2010 - 03:13 PM
R.C.Guild-SM
R.C.Guild-SM


Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Posts: 5931
Location: Harrisburg, PA
whirlingdisc wrote:
The best thing, in my opinion, is to accurately describe ANY flaws (visual or aural) and the buyer can make up his own mind.

There's no way to accurately describe a flaw, ergo the grading system. "Small scratch on b-side", "light scuffs", "minor warp nap" - all of that is information, sure, and it's a plus to include it, but all of those terms (small, light, minor) are subject to interpretation on their own. If I call what looks "mint" to me "near mint", it means I've eliminated the possibility of the buyer spotting something that I might have missed. And if I think something is "near mint", "vg + +" accomplishes the same objective. So I guess I'm saying always drop a record down to a grade that it's arguably one grade better than, and include a sound clip - not only is that how a buyer really gets enough info to make up his own mind, but it virtually eliminates the possibility of complaints.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2007 The PNphpBB Group
Credits